DMBC

Planning application search

Application Details
Planning Application Ref:

P20/0449

Application Date:

27-Mar-2020

Registration Date:

27-Mar-2020

Decision Date:

13-May-2020

Application Type:

Full Planning Permission

Area:

Ward:

Brockmoor and Pensnett Ward

Main Location:

36, Woodfield Avenue, Pensnett, DY5 4RE.

Proposal:

Two storey side and single storey rear extensions (following demoltion of existi

Status:

Approved with Conditions on 13-May-2020

Comment:

This application has already been decided. You cannot comment on it

Applicant Details

Address:

36, Woodfield Avenue, Pensnett, Brierley Hill, DY5 4RE 

Case Officer:

Stephanie Hollands 

Agent Details

Title:

Mr 

Forename/Initial:

P. 

Surname/Company Name:

Ghashghai 

Company Contact Name:

 

Address:

HDI Architecture, 58 Latimer Street, Leicester, LE3 0QE 

Decision Details

Decision:

Approved with Conditions on 13-May-2020 

Decision Date:

13-May-2020 

Publicity Details

Publicity Start Date:

 

Publicity End Date:

 

Conditions/Reasons For Refusal

Type Short Desc
Condition AHOU0A – Standard Householder A - Materials to Match
 

Associated Media

View Documents associated with this Application.

Appeal Details

There are no appeal details for this application

Legal Agreements

There are no legal agreements for this application

Consultees

Name Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
Hasa

Interested Parties

Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
 

Neighbours

Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
34, WOODFIELD AVENUE, PENSNETT, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 4RE
28, SEVERN DRIVE, PENSNETT, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 4QS
26, SEVERN DRIVE, PENSNETT, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 4QS
38, WOODFIELD AVENUE, PENSNETT, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 4RE
14, WOODFIELD AVENUE, PENSNETT, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 4RE
16, WOODFIELD AVENUE, PENSNETT, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 4RE
 

Amendments

Amendment Type Notes Response Date Requested Cutoff Date Received Date
Plan With regards to the above application, as submitted I am unable to support due to the following reasons being a semi-detached property: • The first floor of the two storey side extension does not have a minimum set back of at least 750mm. Only the first floor requires a minimum 0.75m set back, the ground floor can be flush with the existing building line of the front elevation. • The roof on the proposed two storey side extension is not set down enough from the ridge of the roof on the original house. These requirements are applied for all two storey side extensions of semi-detached dwellings as stated in our supplementary planning guidance on house extensions. This is due to semi-detached houses are normally designed as a matching pair - In order not to upset the balance of the buildings, any side extension should be set back from the front of the building. Setting back an extension will provide a design break between old and new, enabling the original building to dominate. This will also disguise different brick course heights, prevent visible damage when bonding into brickwork and maintain the separation of eaves and guttering detail. Please find attached a copy of our House Extension Design Guide Planning Guidance Note. Please submit the amended plans no later than Monday 27th April 2020. Many thanks Amended plans received as requested. 14-Apr-2020 27-Apr-2020
 
HTS Name: wphappdetail-default.hts
Logical ID: WPHAPPDETAIL