DMBC

Planning application search

> Application Details
Application Details
Planning Application Ref:

P20/0803

Application Date:

16-Jun-2020

Registration Date:

16-Jun-2020

Decision Date:

31-Jul-2020

Application Type:

Full Planning Permission

Area:

Ward:

Gornal Ward

Main Location:

18, Botany Drive, Upper Gornal, DY3 3XT.

Proposal:

Split level two storey side extension and two storey rear extension with Juliet

Status:

Approved with Conditions on 31-Jul-2020

Comment:

This application has already been decided. You cannot comment on it

Applicant Details

Address:

18, Botany Drive, Upper Gornal, Dudley, DY3 3XT 

Case Officer:

Stephanie Hollands 

Agent Details

Title:

Mr 

Forename/Initial:

 

Surname/Company Name:

Brock Charles Architects 

Company Contact Name:

Ellson 

Address:

Unit 3 The Old School House Arrow, Alcester, Warwickshire, United Kingdom, B49 5PJ 

Decision Details

Decision:

Approved with Conditions on 31-Jul-2020 

Decision Date:

31-Jul-2020 

Publicity Details

Publicity Start Date:

 

Publicity End Date:

 

Conditions/Reasons For Refusal

Type Short Desc
Condition AHOU0A – Standard Householder A - Materials to Match
 

Associated Media

View Documents associated with this Application.

Appeal Details

There are no appeal details for this application

Legal Agreements

There are no legal agreements for this application

Consultees

Name Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
Peterknecht

Interested Parties

Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
 

Neighbours

Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
16, Botany Drive, Upper Gornal, Dudley, DY3 3XT
9, Old Quarry Drive, Upper Gornal, Dudley, DY3 3XS
20, BOTANY DRIVE, UPPER GORNAL, DUDLEY, DY3 3XT
23, BOTANY DRIVE, UPPER GORNAL, DUDLEY, DY3 3XT
21, BOTANY DRIVE, UPPER GORNAL, DUDLEY, DY3 3XT
19, Botany Drive, Upper Gornal, Dudley, DY3 3XT
 

Amendments

Amendment Type Notes Response Date Requested Cutoff Date Received Date
Plan With regards to the above application, unfortunately as submitted I am unable to support due to the overlooking and loss of privacy that would result from the proposed balcony. As there is no issue with the proposed two storey side extension or the single storey rear extension it is now recommended in order to progress this application more positively that amended plans are submitted omitting the proposed balcony. Applicant wishes to have the decision made as submitted and will appeal the decision. Plans now received omitting the rear balcony and replacing with two storey rear extension with Juliette balcony 06-Jul-2020 20-Jul-2020
 
HTS Name: wphappdetail-default.hts
Logical ID: WPHAPPDETAIL