Planning application search

> Application Details

Application Details

Planning Application Ref:

P22/0124

Application Date:

Registration Date:

28-Jan-2022

Decision Date:

27-Apr-2022

Application Type:

Full Planning Permission

Area:

Ward:

Wordsley Ward

Main Location:

146, BALMORAL ROAD, WORDSLEY, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 5JG

Proposal:

First floor side extension and partial garage conversion

Status:

Approved with Conditions on 27-Apr-2022

Comment:

This application has already been decided. You cannot comment on it

Address Details
Documents
Appeal Details
Legal Agreements

Applicant Details

Address:

146, BALMORAL ROAD, WORDSLEY, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 5JG

Case Officer:

Bethany Shinton

Agent Details

Title:

Forename/Initial:

Surname/Company Name:

Wade

Company Contact Name:

Address:

fORM.architecture, 4 King William Street, Amblecote, Amblecote, Stourbridge, DY8 4EP

Decision Details

Decision:

Approved with Conditions on 27-Apr-2022

Decision Date:

27-Apr-2022

Publicity Details

Publicity Start Date:

Publicity End Date:

Conditions/Reasons For Refusal

Type	Short Desc
Condition	AHOU0A – Standard Householder A - Materials to Match

Consultees

Name	Address	Last Letter Date	Target Response Date
Potts

Interested Parties

Address	Last Letter Date	Target Response Date

Neighbours

Address	Last Letter Date	Target Response Date
148, BALMORAL ROAD, WORDSLEY, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 5JG
51, HAMILTON DRIVE, WORDSLEY, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 5EX
53, HAMILTON DRIVE, WORDSLEY, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 5EX
49, HAMILTON DRIVE, WORDSLEY, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 5EX
144, BALMORAL ROAD, WORDSLEY, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 5JG
103, BALMORAL ROAD, WORDSLEY, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 5JG
105, BALMORAL ROAD, WORDSLEY, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 5JG
101, BALMORAL ROAD, WORDSLEY, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 5JG

Amendments

Amendment Type	Notes	Response	Date Requested	Cutoff Date	Received Date
Plan	Amended plans were sought to decrease the size of the proposed dormer window to mirror the existing dormer window. increase the proposed set back to 0.75m, as is standard, in order to create a visual break between old and new and to prevent precedent in the pattern of development which would create the terracing effect	Amended plans were initially provided including a concave design in the roof which was not considered acceptable in design terms. Amended plans were provided which changed the pitch in the lower slope of the proposed first floor roof so it didn't match the pitch of the host dwelling, but the upper slope did. This resulted in a set back at the point of the eaves of 0.3m but a set back of 0.9m at the point in the change of the pitch of the proposed roof which was considered acceptable on balance. The dormer window was amended as requested.	25-Mar-2022

HTS Name: wphappdetail-default.hts
Logical ID: WPHAPPDETAIL