DMBC

Planning application search

> Application Details
Application Details
Planning Application Ref:

P22/0786

Application Date:

Registration Date:

17-Jun-2022

Decision Date:

26-Aug-2022

Application Type:

Full Planning Permission

Area:

Ward:

Pedmore and Stourbridge East Ward

Main Location:

6, Rectory Close, Oldswinford, Stourbridge, DY8 2HD

Proposal:

Two storey side extension and single storey front extension (following demolitio

Status:

Appeal decided

Comment:

This application has already been decided. You cannot comment on it

Applicant Details

Address:

6, Rectory Close, Oldswinford, Stourbridge, DY8 2HD 

Case Officer:

Bethany Shinton 

Agent Details

Title:

Mr 

Forename/Initial:

V. 

Surname/Company Name:

Smith 

Company Contact Name:

 

Address:

9, Hampton Grove, Kinver, South Staffs, DY7 6LP 

Decision Details

Decision:

Appeal decided 

Decision Date:

26-Aug-2022 

Publicity Details

Publicity Start Date:

 

Publicity End Date:

 

Conditions/Reasons For Refusal

Type Short Desc
Condition MATCH EXISTING
Condition PLANS
Condition THREE YEARS
Informative DESIGN
 

Associated Media

View Documents associated with this Application.

Appeal Details

Type of Appeal:

Householder Appeal Service 

Appeal Lodged Date:

06-Sep-2022 

Appeal Decision:

Allowed 

Appeal Decision Date:

20-Feb-2023 

Legal Agreements

There are no legal agreements for this application

Consultees

Name Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
Wheeler

Interested Parties

Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
 

Neighbours

Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
7, Rectory Close, Oldswinford, Stourbridge, DY8 2HD
5, RECTORY CLOSE, OLDSWINFORD, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 2HD
9, RECTORY CLOSE, OLDSWINFORD, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 2HD
8, RECTORY CLOSE, OLDSWINFORD, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 2HD
7, Rectory Close, Oldswinford, Stourbridge, DY8 2HD
 

Amendments

Amendment Type Notes Response Date Requested Cutoff Date Received Date
Plan Amended plans were sought to remove the proposed first floor overhang of the two storey side extension in order to prevent a visible, incongruous overhang that would appear out of character to both the host dwelling and within the wider streetscene. This was requested to be achieved either by reducing the width of the first floor to line through with the side elevation of the ground floor, or to increase the width of the ground floor so it lined through with the side elevation of the first floor. The agent and applicant declined to provide the requested amendments and have requested refusal of the application in order to appeal the decision. 22-Jul-2022 05-Aug-2022
 
HTS Name: wphappdetail-default.hts
Logical ID: WPHAPPDETAIL