DMBC

Planning application search

> Application Details
Application Details
Planning Application Ref:

P23/0318

Application Date:

06-Mar-2023

Registration Date:

06-Mar-2023

Decision Date:

17-Jan-2024

Application Type:

Full Planning Permission

Area:

Ward:

Quarry Bank and Dudley Wood Ward

Main Location:

12, NOTTINGHAM WAY, QUARRY BANK, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 1UH

Proposal:

Erection of front canopy (retrospective)

Status:

Approved with Conditions on 17-Jan-2024

Comment:

This application has already been decided. You cannot comment on it

Applicant Details

Address:

12, NOTTINGHAM WAY, QUARRY BANK, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 1UH 

Case Officer:

Bethany Shinton 

Agent Details

Title:

 

Forename/Initial:

N. 

Surname/Company Name:

Beecham 

Company Contact Name:

 

Address:

NB Architectural Design, NMB Projects Ltd, Lumaneri House,, Blythe Gate,, Blythe Valley Park,, B90 8AH 

Decision Details

Decision:

Approved with Conditions on 17-Jan-2024 

Decision Date:

17-Jan-2024 

Publicity Details

Publicity Start Date:

 

Publicity End Date:

 

Conditions/Reasons For Refusal

Type Short Desc
Condition AHOU0A – Standard Householder A - Materials to Match
 

Associated Media

View Documents associated with this Application.

Appeal Details

There are no appeal details for this application

Legal Agreements

There are no legal agreements for this application

Consultees

Name Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
Wayne Harper

Interested Parties

Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
 

Neighbours

Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
10, Nottingham Way, QUARRY BANK, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 1UH
14, NOTTINGHAM WAY, QUARRY BANK, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 1UH
12, PEMBRIDGE CLOSE, QUARRY BANK, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 1DG
10, PEMBRIDGE CLOSE, QUARRY BANK, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 1DG
55, Nottingham Way, Quarry Bank, Brierley Hill, DY5 1UH
 

Amendments

Amendment Type Notes Response Date Requested Cutoff Date Received Date
Plan Clarity was sought as the block plan indicated that the proposal did not encroach on neighbour number 14’s front elevation but the proposed plans did and the proposed plans did not match what the case officer had observed on-site. There would have also caused issues as this would indicate that the incorrect Certificate (A) had been signed. Amended plans were provided removing a section of the proposed canopy so it did not encroach on number 14’s front elevation which accurately reflects what was observed on site when the officer undertook a site visit (and that the correct Certificate A was signed). 18-Apr-2023
 
HTS Name: wphappdetail-default.hts
Logical ID: WPHAPPDETAIL