DMBC

Planning application search

> Search Criteria > Search Results > Application Details
Application Details
Planning Application Ref:

P23/0020

Application Date:

06-Jan-2023

Registration Date:

16-Jan-2023

Decision Date:

28-Mar-2023

Application Type:

Full Planning Permission

Area:

Ward:

Wollaston and Stourbridge Town Ward

Main Location:

24, MAMBLE ROAD, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 3SZ

Proposal:

Loft conversion with front and rear dormers

Status:

Refused on 28-Mar-2023

Comment:

This application has already been decided. You cannot comment on it

Applicant Details

Address:

24, MAMBLE ROAD, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 3SZ 

Case Officer:

Bethany Shinton 

Agent Details

Title:

Mrs 

Forename/Initial:

L. 

Surname/Company Name:

Darby 

Company Contact Name:

 

Address:

Hemmings, Hampton House Farm, Kineton, Warwick, CV35 0JH 

Decision Details

Decision:

Refused on 28-Mar-2023 

Decision Date:

28-Mar-2023 

Publicity Details

Publicity Start Date:

 

Publicity End Date:

 

Conditions/Reasons For Refusal

Type Short Desc
Informative HOUR 3 - Householder Refusal – Design
Informative HOUR 3 - Householder Refusal – Design
 

Associated Media

View Documents associated with this Application.

Appeal Details

There are no appeal details for this application

Legal Agreements

There are no legal agreements for this application

Consultees

Name Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
Field

Interested Parties

Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
75, Mamble Road, Wollaston, Stourbridge, DY8 3SY
 

Neighbours

Address Last Letter Date Target Response Date
22, MAMBLE ROAD, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 3SZ
26, MAMBLE ROAD, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 3SZ
75, MAMBLE ROAD, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 3SY
73, MAMBLE ROAD, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 3SY
39, KING STREET, WOLLASTON, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 3QB
37, KING STREET, WOLLASTON, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 3QB
77, MAMBLE ROAD, STOURBRIDGE, DY8 3SY
 

Amendments

Amendment Type Notes Response Date Requested Cutoff Date Received Date
Plan 7. Amended plans were sought to remove the proposed front dormer window and replace with Velux windows instead and to reduce the scale of the scale of the proposed rear dormer; this was to prevent an incongruous addition to the front of the property which is considered uncharacteristic of the original row of terraced houses and to ensure the proposed rear dormer would not dominate the rear plane of the roof and interfere with the original chimney stack. It was also highlighted that Velux rooflights to the front of the roof and a rear dormer could potentially be achieved under permitted development rights instead. The agent advised that they wished to proceed to refusal of the original plans so they can appeal the decision. 07-Mar-2023
 
HTS Name: wphappdetail-default.hts
Logical ID: WPHAPPDETAIL